[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 17]
[Revised as of April 1, 2001]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 26CFR301.6323(g)-1] [Page 240-244]

TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY --
(Continued)

In General
Sec. 301.6323(g)-1   Refiling of notice of tax lien.
(a) In general--
(1) Requirement to refile. In order to continue the effect of a notice of lien, the notice must be refiled in the place described in paragraph (b) of this section during the required refiling period (described in paragraph (c) of this section). In the event that two or more notices of lien are filed with respect to a particular tax assessment, the failure to comply with the provisions of paragraphs (b)(1)i) and (c) of this section in respect of one of the notices of lien does not affect the effectiveness of the refiling of any other notice of lien. Except for the filing of a notice of lien required by paragraph (bb)(1)(ii) of this section (relating to a change of residence) the validity of any refiling of a notice of lien is not affected by the refiling or nonrefiling of any other notice of lien.

(2) Effect of refiling. A timely refiled notice of lien is effective as of the date on which the notice of lien to which it relates was effective.

(3) Effect of failure to refile If the district director fails to refile a notice of lien in the manner described in paragraphs (b) and of this section, the notice of lien is not effective, after the expiration of the required refiling period, as against any person without regard to when the interest of the person in the property subject to the lien was acquired. However, the failure of the district director to refile a notice of lien during the required refiling period will not, following the expiration of the refiling period, affect the effectiveness of the notice with respect to:

(i) Property which is the subject matter of a suit, to which the United States is a party, commenced prior to the expiration of the required refiling period, or

(ii) Property which has been levied upon by the United States prior to the expiration of the refiling period.
However, if a suit or levy referred to in the preceding sentence is dismissed or released and the property is subject to the lien at such time, a notice of lien with respect to the property is not effective after the suit or levy is dismissed or released unless refiled during the required refiling period. Failure to refile a notice of lien does not affect the existence of the lien.
(4) Filing of new notice. If a notice of lien is not refiled, and if the lien remains in existence, the Internal Revenue Service may nevertheless file a new notice of lien either on the form prescribed for the filing of a notice of lien or on the form prescribed for refiling a notice of lien. This new filing must meet the requirements of section 6323(f) and Sec. 301.6323(f)-1 and is effective from the date on which such filing is made.
(b) Place for refiling notice of lien--
(1) In general. A notice of lien refiled during the required refiling period (described in paragraph (c) of this section) shall be effective only--
(i) If the notice of lien is refiled in the office in which the prior notice of lien (including a refiled notice) was filed under the provisions of section 6323; and

(ii) In any case in which 90 days or more prior to the date the refiling of the notice of lien under subdivision (i) is completed, the Internal Revenue Service receives written information (in the manner described in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph (b)) concerning a change in the taxpayer's residence, if a notice of such lien is also filed in accordance with section 6323(f)(1)(A)(ii) in the State in which such new residence is located (or, if such new residence is located without the United States, in the District of Columbia).

A notice of lien is considered as refiled in the office in which the prior notice or refiled notice was filed under the provisions of section 6323 if it is refiled in the office which, pursuant to a change in the applicable local law, assumed the functions of the office in which the prior notice or refiled notice was filed. If on or before the 90th day referred to in subdivision (ii) more than one written notice is received concerning a change in the taxpayer's residence, a notice of lien is required by this subdivision to be filed only with respect to the residence shown on the written notice received on the most recent date. Subdivision (ii) is applicable regardless of whether the taxpayer resides at the new residence on the date the refiling of notice of lien under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph is completed.
(2) Notice of change of taxpayer's residence--
(i) In general. Except as provided in subdivision (ii) or (iii) of this subparagraph, for purposes of this section, a notice of change of a taxpayer's residence will be effective only if it (A) is received, in writing, from the taxpayer or his representative by the district director or the service center director having jurisdiction where the original notice of lien was filed, (B) relates to an unpaid tax liability of the taxpayer, and (C) states the taxpayer's name and the address of his new residence. Although it is not necessary that a written notice contain the taxpayer's identifying number authorized by section 6109, it is preferable that it include such number. For purposes of this subdivision, a notice of change of a taxpayer's residence shown on a return or an amended return (including a return of the same tax) will not be effective to notify the Internal Revenue Service.

(ii) Notice received before August 23, 1976. For purposes of this section, a notice of a change of a taxpayer's residence will also be effective if it (A) is received, in writing, by any office of the Internal Revenue Service before August 23, 1976, from the taxpayer or his representative, (B) relates to an unpaid tax liability of the taxpayer, and (C) states the taxpayer's name and the address of his new residence.

(iii) By return or amended return. For purposes of this section, in the case of a notice of lien which relates to an assessment of tax made after December 31, 1966, a notice of change of a taxpayer's residence will also be effective if it is contained in a return or amended return of the same type of tax filed with the Internal Revenue Service by the taxpayer or his representative which on its face indicates that there is a change in the taxpayer's address and correctly states the taxpayer's name, the address of his new residence, and his identifying number required by section 6109.

(iv) Other rules applicable. Except as provided in subdivisions (i), (ii), and (iii) of this subparagraph, no communication (either written or oral) to the Internal Revenue Service will be considered effective as notice of a change of a taxpayer's residence under this section, whether or not the Service has actual notice or knowledge of the taxpayer's new residence. For the purpose of determining the date on which a notice of change of a taxpayer's residence is received under this section, the notice shall be treated as received on the date it is actually received by the Internal Revenue Service without reference to the provisions of section 7502.
(3) Examples. The provisions of this section may be illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. A, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of State M and owns real property in State N. In accordance with Sec. 301.6323(f)-1, notices of lien are filed in States M and N. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in M, the Internal Revenue Service must refile, during the required refiling period, the notice of lien with the appropriate office in M but is not required to refile the notice of lien with the appropriate office in N. Similarly, in order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in State N, the Internal Revenue Service must refile, during the required refiling period, the notice of lien with the appropriate office in N but is not required to refile the notice of lien with the appropriate office in M.

Example 2. B, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of State M. In accordance with Sec. 301.6323(f)-1, notice of lien is properly filed in State. One year before the beginning of the required refiling period, B establishes his residence in State N, and B immediately notifies the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in M, the Internal Revenue Service must refile, during the required refiling period, notices of lien with ( i) the appropriate office in M, and (ii) the appropriate office in N, because B properly notified the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to N more than 89 days prior to the date refiling of the notice of lien in M is completed. Even if the Internal Revenue Service had acquired actual notice or knowledge of B's change in residence by other means, if B had not properly notified the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence, the effect of the notice of lien in State M could have been continued without any refiling in State N.

Example 3. C, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of State O. In accordance with Sec. 301.6323(f)-1, notice of lien is properly filed in that State. Four years before the required refiling period, C establishes his residence in State P, and C immediately notifies the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Three years before the required refiling period, C establishes his residence in State R, and again C immediately notifies the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (2) of this section. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in O, the Internal Revenue Service must refile, during the required refiling period, notices of lien with ( i) the appropriate office in O, and (ii) the appropriate office in R. Refiling in R is required because the notice received by the Service of C's change in residence to R was the most recent notice received more than 89 days prior to the date refiling in O is completed. The notice of lien is not required to be filed in P, even though C properly notified the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to P, because such notice is not the most recent one received.

Example 4. Assume the same facts as in example 3, except that C does not notify the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to R in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in O, the Internal Revenue Service must refile, during the required refiling period, the notice of lien with ( i) the appropriate office in O, and (ii) the appropriate office in P. Refiling in P is required because C properly notified the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to P, even though C is not a resident of P on the date refiling of the notice of lien in O is completed. The Internal Revenue Service is not required to file a notice of lien in R because C did not properly notify the Service of his change in residence to R.

[Page 243]
Example 5. D, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of State M and owns real property in States N and O. In accordance with Sec. 301.6323(f)-1, the Internal Revenue Service files notices of lien in M, N, and O States. Five years and 6 months after the date of the assessment shown on the notice of lien, D establishes his residence in P, and at that time the Internal Revenue Service received from D a notification of his change in residence in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. On a date which is 5 years and 7 months after the date of the assessment shown on the notice of lien, the Internal Revenue Servbice properly refiles notices of lien in M, N, and O which refilings are sufficient to continue the effect of each of the notice of lien. The Internal Revenue Service is not required to file a notice of lien in P because D did not notify the Internal Revenue Service of his change of residence to P more than 89 days prior to the date each of the refilings in M, N, and O was completed.

  Example 6. Assume the same facts as in example 5 except that the refiling of the notice of lien in O occurs 100 days after D notifies the Internal Revenue Service of hischange in residence to P in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in O, in addition to refiling the notice of lien in O, the Internal Revenue Service must also refile, during the required refiling period, a notice of lien in P because D properly notified the Internal Revenue Service of his change of residence to P more than 89 days prior to the date the refiling in O was completed. However, the Internal Revenue Service is not required to refile the notice of lien in P to maintain the effect of the notices of lien in M and N because D did not notify the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to P more than 89 days prior to the date the refilings in M and N were completed.

Example 7. E, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of State T. Because T has not designated one office in the case of personal property for filing notices of lien in accordance with the provisions of section 6323(f )(1)(A)(ii), the Internal Revenue Service properly files a notice of lien with the clerk of the appropriate United States district court. However, solely as a matter of convenience for those who may have occasion to search for notices of lien, and not as a matter of legal effectiveness, the Internal Revenue Service also files notice of lien with the recorder of deeds of the county in T where E resides. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service sends a copy of the notice of lien to the X life insurance company to give the company actual notice of the notice of lien. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien, the Internal Revenue Service must refile the notice of lien with the clerk of the appropriate United States district court during the required refiling period. In order to continue the effect of the notice of the lien, it is not necessary to refile the notice of lien with the Recorder of Deeds of the county where E resides, because the refiling of the notice of lien with the recorder of deeds does not constitute a proper filing for the purposes of section 6323(f). In addition, to continue the effect of the notice of lien under this section it is not necessary to send a copy of the notice of lien to the X life insurance company, because the sending of a notice of lien to an insurance company does not constitute a proper filing for the purposes of section 6323(f).
(c) Required refiling period-- (1) In general. For the purpose of this section, except as provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph (c), the term ``required refiling period'' means-- ( i) The 1-year period ending 30 days after the expiration of 6 years after the date of the assessment of the tax, and
(ii) The 1-year period ending with the expiration of 6 years after the close of the preceding required refiling period for such notice of lien.
(2) Tax assessments made before January 1, 1962. If the assessment of the tax is made before January 1, 1962, the first required refiling period shall be the calendar year 1967. Thus, to maintain the effectiveness of any notice of lien on file which relates to a lien which arose before January 1, 1962, the Internal Revenue Service will refile the notice of lien during the calendar year 1967.

(3) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. On March 1, 1963, an assessment of tax is made against B, a delinquent taxpayer, and a lien for the amount of the assessment arises on that date. On July 1, 1963, in accordance with Sec. 301.6323(f)-1, a notice of lien is filed. The notice of lien filed on July 1, 1963, is effective through March 31, 1969. The first required refiling period for the notice of lien begins on April 1, 1968, and ends on March 31, 1969. A refiling of the notice of lien during that period will extend the effectiveness of the notice of lien filed on July 1, 1963, through March 31, 1975. The second required refiling period for the notice of lien begins on April 1, 1974, and ends of March 31, 1975.

Example 2. Assume the same facts as in example 1, except that although the Internal Revenue Service fails to refile a notice of lien during the first required refiling period
[Page 244] (April 1, 1963, through March 31, 1969), a notice of lien is filed on June 2, 1971, in accordance with Sec. 301.6323(f)-1. Because of this filing, the notice of lien filed on June 2, 1971, is effective as of June 2, 1971. That notice must be refiled during the 1-year period ending on March 31, 1975, if it is to continue in effect after March 31, 1975.

Example 3. On April 1, 1960, an assessment of tax is made against B, a delinquent taxpayer, and a tax lien for the amount of the assessment arises on that date. On June 1, 1962, in accordance with Sec. 301.6323(f)-1, a notice of lien is filed. Because the assessment of tax was made before January 1, 1962, the notice of lien filed on June 1, 1962, is effective through December 31, 1967. The first required refiling period for the notice of lien is the calendar year 1967. A refiling of the notice of lien during 1967 will extend the effectiveness of the notice of lien filed on June 1, 1962, through December 31, 1973. [T.D. 7429, 41 FR 35509, Aug. 23, 1976]

-       -       -       -       -       -       
 
 
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 17]
[Revised as of April 1, 2001]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR400.1-1]
 
[Page 734-737]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
   CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY-- 
                               (Continued)
 
PART 400--TEMPORARY REGULATIONS UNDER THE FEDERAL TAX LIEN ACT OF 1966--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 400.1- 1   Refiling of notice of tax lien.
 
    (a) Scope. This section provides rules with respect to the 
 provisions contained in section 6323(g), relating to the  refiling of a 
 notice of lien arising under section 6321. In general, section 6323(g) 
 contains new rules requiring the Internal Revenue Service to  refile a 
 notice of lien during the 1-year period ending 30 days after the 
 expiration of the normal 6-year statutory period for collection of an 
 assessed tax liability, and each succeeding period of 6 years, in order 
 to maintain the effectiveness of a notice of lien. These provisions in 
 section 6323 were added by section 101(a) of the Federal Tax Lien Act of 
 1966 (80 Stat. 1125), effective after November 2, 1966.
    (b) Requirement to  refile. In order to continue the effect of a 
 notice of lien, the notice must be  refiled in the place described in 
 paragraph (c) of this section during the required  refiling period 
( described in paragraph (d) of this section). In the event that two or 
 more notices of lien are filed with respect to a particular tax 
 assessment, the failure to comply with the provisions of paragraphs 
(c)(1)( i)  and (d) of this section in respect of one of the notices of 
 lien does not affect the effectiveness of the  refiling of the other 
 notice or notices of lien. Thus, except for the filing of a notice of 
 lien required by paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section relating to a 
 change of residence, the validity of any  refiling of a notice of lien is 
 not affected by the  refiling or non- refiling of any other notice of 
 lien. The effectiveness of a timely  refiled notice of lien relates back 
 to the date on which the notice of lien was effective before the 
  refiling. If the district director fails to  refile a notice of lien in 
 the manner described in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, the 
 notice of lien is not effective, after the expiration of the required 
  refiling period, as against any person without regard to when the 
 interest of the person in the property subject to the lien was acquired. 
However, the failure of the district director to  refile a notice of lien 
 during the required  refiling period will not affect the effectiveness of 
 the notice with respect to (1) property which is the subject matter of a 
 suit, to which the United States is a party, commenced prior to the 
 expiration of the required  refiling period, or (2) property which has 
 been levied upon by the United States prior to the expiration of the 
 required  refiling period. Failure to  refile a notice of lien does not 
 affect the existence of the lien. If a notice of lien is not  refiled, 
 and if the lien is still in existence, the Internal Revenue Service may 
 nevertheless file a new notice of lien either on the form prescribed for 
 the filing of a notice of lien or on the form prescribed for  refiling a 
 notice of lien. This new filing must meet the requirements of section 
6323(f) and is effective from the date on which such filing is made. 
Upon written request of any person who has a proper interest, any 
 district director may issue a certificate of release of lien if notice 
 of the lien has not been  refiled within the required  refiling period and 
 the entire liability for the tax has been satisfied or has become 
 unenforceable as a matter of law. Such request should be sent to the 
 district director for the internal revenue district shown on the notice 
 of lien. For provisions relating to certificates of release of lien, see 
 section 6325.
    (c) Place for  refiling notice of lien-- (1) In general. A notice of 
 lien  refiled during the required  refiling period (described in paragraph 
(d)  of this section) shall be effective only--
    ( i) If the notice of lien is  refiled in the office in which the 
 prior notice of lien (including a  refiled notice) was filed under the 
 provisions of section 6323; and
    ( ii) In any case in which 90 days or more prior to the date the 
  refiling of
 
[[Page 735]]
 
 the notice of lien under subdivision ( i) of this subparagraph is 
 completed, the Internal Revenue Service receives written information (in 
 the manner described in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph (b)) 
 concerning a change in the taxpayer's residence, if a notice of such 
 lien is also filed in accordance with section 6323f)(1)(A)(ii) in the 
State in which such new residence is located (or, if such new residence 
 is located without the United States, in the District of Columbia). If 
 on or before such 90th day more than one written notice is received 
 concerning a change in the taxpayer's residence, a notice of lien is 
 required by this subdivision to be filed only with respect to the 
 residence shown on the written notice received on the most recent date. 
This subdivision is applicable regardless of whether the taxpayer 
 resides at the new residence on the date the  refiling of notice of lien 
 under subdivision ( i) of this subparagraph is completed.
    (2) Notice of change of taxpayer's residence--( i) In general. Except 
 as provided in subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph, for purposes of 
 this section, a notice of change of a taxpayer's residence will be 
 effective only if it is received, in writing, by the Internal Revenue 
Service from the taxpayer or his representative, relates to an unpaid 
 tax liability of the taxpayer, and states the taxpayer's name and 
 address of his new residence. Although it is not necessary that a 
 written notice contain the taxpayer's identifying number authorized by 
 section 6109, it is preferable that it include such number. For purposes 
 of this subdivision, a notice of change of a taxpayer's residence shown 
 on a return or an amended return (including a return of the same tax) 
 will not be effective to notify the Internal Revenue Service.
    (ii) By return or amended return. For purposes of this section, in 
 the case of a notice of lien which relates to an assessment of tax made 
 after December 31, 1966, a notice of change of a taxpayer's residence 
 will also be effective if it is contained in a return or amended return 
 of the same type of tax filed with the Internal Revenue Service by the 
 taxpayer which on its face indicates that there is a change in the 
 taxpayer's address and correctly states the taxpayer's name, address of 
 his new residence, and his identifying number required by section 6109.
    (iii) Other rules applicable. Other than the means specified in 
 subdivisions ( i) and (ii) of this subparagraph, no communication (either 
 written or oral) to the Internal Revenue Service will be considered 
 effective as notice of a change of a taxpayer's residence under this 
 section, whether or not the Service has actual notice of the taxpayer's 
 residence. For the purpose of determining the date on which a notice of 
 change of a taxpayer's residence is received under this section, the 
 notice shall be treated as received on the date it is actually received 
 by the Internal Revenue Service without reference to the provisions of 
 section 7502.
    (3) Examples. The provisions of this section may be illustrated by 
 the following examples:
 
     Example 1. A, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of M State and 
 owns real property in N State. Notices of lien are properly filed in M 
 and N States. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien 
 filed in M State, the Internal Revenue Service must  refile, during the 
 required  refiling period, the notice of lien with the appropriate office 
 in M State but is not required to  refile the notice of lien with the 
 appropriate office in N State. Similarly, in order to continue the 
 effect of the notice of lien filed in N State, the Internal Revenue 
Service must  refile, during the required  refiling period, the notice of 
 lien with the appropriate office in N State but is not required to 
  refile the notice of lien with the appropriate office in M State.
     Example 2. B, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of M State. 
Notice of lien is properly filed in that State. One year before the 
 required  refiling period, B establishes his residence in N State, and B 
 immediately notifies the Internal Revenue Service of his change in 
 residence in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c)(2) of this 
 section. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in 
M State, the Internal Revenue Service must  refile, during the required 
  refiling period, notices of lien with ( i) the appropriate office in M 
State, and (ii) the appropriate office in N State because B properly 
 notified the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to N 
State more than 89 days prior to the date  refiling of the notice of lien 
 in M State is completed. If B did not notify the Internal Revenue 
Service of his change in residence to N State in accordance with the 
 provisions of paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the Internal Revenue 
Service would not be required to file a notice of lien
 
[[Page 736]]
 
 in N State, even if the Internal Revenue Service had actual notice of 
 B's change in residence to N State. In this latter case, in order to 
 continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in M State, the Internal 
Revenue Service must  refile, during the required  refiling period, the 
 notice of lien only with the appropriate office in M State.
     Example 3. C, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of O State. 
Notice of lien is properly filed in that State. Four years before the 
 required  refiling period, C establishes his residence in P State, and C 
 immediately notifies the Internal Revenue Service of his change in 
 residence in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c)(2) of this 
 section. Three years before the required  refiling period, C establishes 
 his residence in R State, and again C immediately notifies the Internal 
Revenue Service of his change in residence in accordance with the 
 provisions of paragraph (c)(2) of this section. In order to continue the 
 effect of the notice of lien filed in O State, the Internal Revenue 
Service must  refile, during the required  refiling period, notices of 
 lien with ( i) the appropriate office in O State, and (ii) the 
 appropriate office in R State since the notice received by the Service 
 of C's change in residence to R State was the most recent notice 
 received more than 89 days prior to the date  refiling in O State is 
 completed. The notice of lien is not required to be filed in P State, 
 even though C properly notified the Internal Revenue Service of his 
 change in residence to P State, because such notice is not the most 
 recent one received.
     Example 4. Assume the same facts as in example 3, except that C does 
 not notify the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to R 
State in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c )(2) of this 
 section. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in 
O State, the Internal Revenue Service must  refile, during the required 
  refiling period, the notice of lien with ( i) the appropriate office in O 
State, and (ii) the appropriate office in P State because C properly 
 notified the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to P 
State, even though C is not a resident of P State on the date  refiling 
 of the notice of lien in O State is completed. The Internal Revenue 
Service is not required to file a notice of lien in R State because C 
 did not properly notify the Service of his change in residence to R 
 State.
     Example 5. D, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of M State and 
 owns real property in N and O States. The Internal Revenue Service 
 properly files notices of lien in M, N, and O States. Five years and 6 
 months after the date of the assessment shown on the notice of lien, D 
 establishes his residence in P State, and at that time the Internal 
Revenue Service received from D a notification of his change in 
 residence in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c)(2) of this 
 section. On a date which is 5 years and 7 months after the date of the 
 assessment shown on the notice of lien, the Internal Revenue Service 
 properly  refiles notices of lien in M, N, and O States which  refilings 
 continue the effect of each of the notices of lien. The Internal Revenue 
Service is not required to file a notice of lien in P State because D 
 did not notify the Internal Revenue Service of his change of residence 
 to P State more than 89 days prior to the date each of the  refilings in 
M, N, and O States  was completed.
     Example 6. Assume the same facts as in example 5 except that the 
  refiling of the notice of lien in O State occurs 100 days after D 
 notifies the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to P 
State in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c )(2) of this 
 section. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien filed in 
O State, in addition to  refiling the notice of lien in O State, the 
Internal Revenue Service must also file, during the required  refiling 
 period, a notice of lien in P State because D properly notified the 
Internal Revenue Service of his change of residence to P State more than 
89 days prior to the date the  refiling in O State was completed. 
However, in order to maintain the effect of the  refilings in M and N 
States, the Internal Revenue Service is not required to file, during the 
 required  refiling period, the notice of lien in P State since D did not 
 notify the Internal Revenue Service of his change in residence to P 
State more than 89 days prior to the date the  refilings in M and N 
States were completed.
     Example 7. E, a delinquent taxpayer, is a resident of T State. 
Because T State has not designated one office in the case of personal 
 property for filing notices of lien in accordance with the provisions of 
 section 6323(f)(1)(A)(ii), the Internal Revenue Service properly files a 
 notice of lien with the clerk of the appropriate United States district 
 court. However, solely as a matter of convenience for those who may have 
 occasion to search for notices of lien, and not as a matter of legal 
 effectiveness, the Internal Revenue Service also files notice of lien 
 with the recorder of deeds of the county in T State where E resides. In 
 addition, the Internal Revenue Service sent a copy of the notice of lien 
 to the X Life Insurance Company to give the Company actual notice of the 
 notice of lien. In order to continue the effect of the notice of lien, 
 the Internal Revenue Service must  refile, during the required  refiling 
 period, the notice of lien with the clerk of the appropriate U.S. 
 district court. It is not necessary in order to continue the effect of 
 the notice of the lien to  refile the notice of lien with the recorder of 
 deeds of the county where E resides because the  refiling of the notice 
 of lien with the recorder of deeds does not constitute a proper filing 
 for the purposes of section 6323(f). In addition, it is not necessary to 
 continue the effect of the notice
 
[[Page 737]]
 
 of lien under this section to send a copy of the notice of lien to the X 
Life Insurance Company because the sending of a notice of lien to an 
 insurance company does not constitute a filing for the purposes of 
 section 6323 and, thus, a  refiling with an insurance company is not 
 required under this section.
 
    ( d) Required  refiling period--(1) In general. For the purpose of 
 this section, except as provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph 
(d), the term ``required  refiling period'' means--
    ( i) The 1-year period ending 30 days after the expiration of 6 years 
 after the date of the assessment of the tax, and
    (ii) The 1-year period ending with the expiration of 6 years after 
 the close of the preceding required  refiling period for such notice of 
 lien.
    (2) Tax assessments made before January 1, 1962. If the assessment 
 of the tax is made before January 1, 1962, the first required  refiling 
 period shall be the calendar year 1967. Thus, to maintain the 
 effectiveness of any notice of lien on file which relates to a lien 
 which arose before January 1, 1962, the Internal Revenue Service will 
  refile the notice of lien during the calendar year 1967. The second 
 required  refiling period for any such notice of lien is the calendar 
 year 1973.
    (3) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:
 
     Example 1. On March 1, 1963, an assessment of tax is made against B, 
 a delinquent taxpayer, and a lien for the amount of the assessment 
 arises on that date. On July 1, 1963, a notice of lien is properly 
 filed. The notice of lien filed on July 1, 1963, is effective up to and 
 including March 31, 1969. The first required  refiling period for the 
 notice of lien begins on April 1, 1968, and ends on March 31, 1969. A 
  refiling of the notice of lien during that period will extend the 
 effectiveness of the notice of lien filed on July 1, 1963, up to and 
 including March 31, 1975. The second required  refiling period for the 
 notice of lien begins on April 1, 1974, and ends on March 31, 1975.
     Example 2. Assume the same facts as in example 1, except that the 
Internal Revenue Service fails to  refile a notice of lien during the 
 first required  refiling period (Apr. 1, 1968, through Mar. 31, 1969). 
However, a notice of lien which meets the requirements of section 
6323(f) is filed on June 2, 1971. Because of this filing, the notice of 
 lien filed on June 2, 1971, is effective as of June 2, 1971. That notice 
 must itself be  refiled during the 1-year period ending on March 31, 
1975, if it is to continue in effect after March 31, 1975. As in example 
1, the second required  refiling period for the notice of lien begins on 
April 1, 1974, and ends on March 31, 1975.
     Example 3. On April 1, 1960, an assessment of tax is made against B, 
 a delinquent taxpayer, and a tax lien for the amount of the assessment 
 arises on that date. On June 1, 1962, a notice of lien is properly 
 filed. Because the assessment of tax was made before January 1, 1962, 
 the notice of lien filed on June 1, 1962, is effective up to and 
 including December 31, 1967. The first required  refiling period for the 
 notice of lien is the calendar year 1967. A  refiling of the notice of 
 lien during 1967 will extend the effectiveness of the notice of lien 
 filed on June 1, 1962, up to and including December 31, 1973. The second 
 required  refiling period for the notice of lien is the calendar year 1973.
 
[T.D. 6932, 32 FR 14835, Oct. 18, 1967]